Newspaper Editorial Boards Oppose Telecom Immunity
When a key Senate committee voted to include retroactive
immunity for telecom lawbreakers in new legislation, they
may not have been prepared for the rising tide of criticism
coming their way. Newspaper editorial boards and legal
scholars from around the country are speaking out in
increasingly urgent terms about the threat to the rule of
law posed by the immunity provisions. If the bill becomes
law, it will let phone companies off the hook for their
participation in the NSA's massive and illegal wiretapping
program.
Read what the national wires are saying:
For the New York Times editorial, "With Democrats Like
These...": (Registration unfortunately required.)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/20/opinion/20sat1.html?ex=1350705600&en=49dc283050802902&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
For the USA Today editorial, "Our view on Your Phone
Records: Immunity Demand for Telecoms Raises Questions":
http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/10/our-view-on-y-1.html
For the New Jersey Star Ledger editorial, "No Immunity for
Telecoms":
http://blog.nj.com/njv_editorial_page/2007/10/no_immunity_for_telecoms.html#more
For the Philadelphia Daily News editorial, "Dems, Hold Fast
on Wiretap Law: Telecoms Need a Spine, Not Immunity From
Lawsuits":
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/opinion/20071016_DEMS__HOLD_FAST_ON_WIRETAP_LAW.html
Find out what other national newspapers siding with EFF on
this issue are saying in our complete post:
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2007/10/newspaper-editorial-boards-oppose-telecom-immunity
For more on EFF's class-action lawsuit against AT&T:
http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att
: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
* Computer & Communications Industry Association Opposes
Amnesty for Telecoms
Last week, the influential Computer & Communications
Industry Association (CCIA) sent a letter to Speaker of the
House Pelosi opposing immunity for telecommunications
companies involved in the illegal warrantless surveillance
program. CCIA encouraged Congress "to reject broad immunity
provisions in favor of a better balance between legitimate
national security interests and basic Fourth Amendment
privacy for U.S. citizens."
We applaud CCIA for taking a stand for justice and for the
privacy and security of the American people.
Read CCIA's letter to Pelosi:
http://www.eff.org/files/CCIALtr-10-16-2007Pelosi.pdf
When a key Senate committee voted to include retroactive
immunity for telecom lawbreakers in new legislation, they
may not have been prepared for the rising tide of criticism
coming their way. Newspaper editorial boards and legal
scholars from around the country are speaking out in
increasingly urgent terms about the threat to the rule of
law posed by the immunity provisions. If the bill becomes
law, it will let phone companies off the hook for their
participation in the NSA's massive and illegal wiretapping
program.
Read what the national wires are saying:
For the New York Times editorial, "With Democrats Like
These...": (Registration unfortunately required.)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10
For the USA Today editorial, "Our view on Your Phone
Records: Immunity Demand for Telecoms Raises Questions":
http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped
For the New Jersey Star Ledger editorial, "No Immunity for
Telecoms":
http://blog.nj.com/njv_editori
For the Philadelphia Daily News editorial, "Dems, Hold Fast
on Wiretap Law: Telecoms Need a Spine, Not Immunity From
Lawsuits":
http://www.philly.com/dailynew
Find out what other national newspapers siding with EFF on
this issue are saying in our complete post:
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks
For more on EFF's class-action lawsuit against AT&T:
http://www.eff.org/legal/cases
: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
* Computer & Communications Industry Association Opposes
Amnesty for Telecoms
Last week, the influential Computer & Communications
Industry Association (CCIA) sent a letter to Speaker of the
House Pelosi opposing immunity for telecommunications
companies involved in the illegal warrantless surveillance
program. CCIA encouraged Congress "to reject broad immunity
provisions in favor of a better balance between legitimate
national security interests and basic Fourth Amendment
privacy for U.S. citizens."
We applaud CCIA for taking a stand for justice and for the
privacy and security of the American people.
Read CCIA's letter to Pelosi:
http://www.eff.org/files
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home